May Conference Recap

by on Jun.03, 2013, under Web Dev

I had the pleasure of attending portions of Google IO, CSS Conf, and JS Conf and wanted to summarize my notes on these conferences. These are my own take aways and may not have been what the presenter intended. If I’m completely off base, please feel free to drop me a line. This is also not inclusive as there are only so many sessions that one can attend :)

Major Trends


Biggest theme of all of these conferences was attempting to create ways of compoentizing our code so that we can leave the smell of the poo all in one place, to paraphrase @danwrong.


Google has the Polymer framework which polyfils web components. The premise is that you can create truly isolated components that are drop in and do not have worries such as CSS impact from other components.

<element name="my-element">
    I'm a my-element!
  <footer>nothing to see here</footer>
    // When <element> is in document, might run in wrong context.
    // Only do work when this == <element>.
    if (this !== window) {
      var section = this.querySelector('section');
        prototype: {
          readyCallback: function() {
            this.innerHTML = section.innerHTML;

This looks pretty amazing and I think will provide some awesome separation of concerns between content and behaviors in the future. Polyfilling this behavior seems outright genius but at the same time scares me as you are basing a lot of your implementation on something that is being hacked into the browser.

I’m of the opinion that this is amazing future looking work but is a bit more risk than I’d like to take on for my user base.

With standards support for this moving forward I think this is where we will be in 5-10 years depending on the user base that a project is required to support. I also believe that there is a huge opportunity here for developer tooling as this changes some things up that will require changes and improvements to our existing hint/test/minimize/etc tool stacks.


Facebook is doing similar work with their React framework. They have created a new compiled to JavaScript language that allows one to embed html into the source file:

var HelloMessage = React.createClass({
  render: function() {
    return <div>{'Hello ' +}</div>;

The framework will then manage the all of the rendering lifecycle without data binding or blanket re-rendering. This is apparently done by a DOM diffing algorithm that walks the DOM tree and updates only the components that need to be on a property change. The presenting team highlighted that you can provide hints to this implementation to improve performance so I do question how well this scales.

I have not had a chance to play around with this implementation but I am not against the html embedded in a JavaScript file like many people in the blogosphere are/have been. I think both this and polymer tackle separation of concerns in a different manner than the HTML/CSS/JS paradigm that has been beat into web developers for so long. I see them as implementing separation of concerns at a content vs. behavior level which may be better for some workflows.


Flight from Twitter attempts to handle componetization at a much smaller level. They focus on defining interfaces between discrete components. Each of these components can focus on only their implementation.

This is lower-level than the systems above and in many ways can be used to build other framework systems.


Performance was a huge concern at all 3 conferences with many sessions devoted to different aspects of performance improvements. My major take aways are:

  • Don’t follow a coding pattern because something is “faster”. What exactly is faster will change as runtimes optimize for the code that they are seeing. Instead look at what the tools are saying and react accordingly.

  • Don’t prematurely optimize. You are probably wrong. Your code is most likely going to be harder to understand and there is plenty that you can spend time as engineering time is finite.

  • Performance is holistic.

    • JavasScript, layout, rendering, compositing, GC, etc. can all impact performance.
    • Newer architectures are moving behaviors out to other threads but this does not work if you try to implement your own behavior. Custom scrolling is the biggest offender here.
    • Under current Chrome implementations touch handlers can cause scrolling issues as it disables certain scrolling optimizations.
  • Chrome is the leader in debugging tools and ability to investigate performance

    • Chrome dev tools timeline panel
    • about:tracing – Google’s internal performance tool
    • V8 tools – In depth V8 profiling tools
    • Continuous painting mode lets you test performance impact of specific elements or properties
    • Remote debugging API (This powers Chrome for Android debugging and topcoat performance monitor)
  • Higher level console commands are useful

    • console.time
    • These are not always evil and can help programmers with onboarding
  • Topcoat has a turbo mode which attempts to remove layout and style calculation from overhead. All elements have style element and are absolutely positioned. On a personal note this seems a bit overboard for 99% of use cases.

  • High-speed cameras can be used in the name of performance testing! :)

Many V8 specific performance recommendations as well:

  • V8 has an optimized/unoptimized state machine that a particular piece of code may jump between. Can’t tell at compile time if something will be promoted to optimized once hot. When profiling should look for * token next to function names to verify that it’s optimized.

  • Memory allocation pattern between optimized and unoptimized are dramatically different. Optimized will often remove temp variables wereas unoptimized will have to GC temp variables.

  • Can monitor state machine with --js-flags="--trace-deopt --trace-opt-verbose". WARN: Very verbose. Pipe & Grep

Better Tooling

Adobe and Google had strong developer tools showings at these conferences.

Adobe demoed some very cool features for their brackets IDE including:

  • PSDLens – PSD inspector assistant
  • Response – Responsive design editor
  • Theseus – Brackets debugger concept
  • Instabug – Live code inspector with visual unit test executor/generator

Additionally they covered some of the tools involved with their topcoat project:

On the Google front, most of the improvements were in the Chrome Developer Tools including:

  • Flame charts
  • Full remote dev tools on Chrome For Android
  • SASS support, generically via source maps
  • Live editing with mapped update support

JavasScript everywhere

One of the other fun themes was the use of JavaScript in more and more places. This included a hacking day on various bots and AR Drones for those who choose those sessions. This culminated with a Nodebot shooting down a NodeCopter and calls for Node-based Aircraft Carriers.

Random Coolness

  • @rem demoing game with RTC and getUserMedia
  • @seb_ly giving an amazing presentation including crowd participation from 5000 miles away and live coding over VNC
  • @necolas – Get over yourself. Tech changes every few years and all of the battles today will likely be moot in a few years.

Outside of the above there we’re a lot of fun and interesting sessions that could be discussed in depth but suffice to say that the JavasScript and Web Development communities are very strong and there is a lot of interesting stuff coming down the pipes.

Comments Off on May Conference Recap :, more...

OSX Frontend Toolchain

by on Jan.30, 2013, under Dev

I’m currently in the middle of inventorying my machine so I can retire the time machine image that has spanned far too many years and far too many machines. Rather than stuffing this in Evernote to be used once I figured I’d post this to the community.

What other frontend tools are missing? Which ones have better alternatives?


  • SublimeText 2

    Common plugins include:

    • Package Control – Allows all other plugins to be installed
    • BracketHighlighter
    • Git
    • Handlebars.tmBundle
    • JsFormat
    • JsHint
    • PrettyJSON
    • Stylus
    • SublimeSaveOnBuild
    • TrailingSpaces

    Useful config options:

      "bold_folder_labels": true,
      "draw_white_space": "all",
      "ensure_newline_at_eof_on_save": true,
      "highlight_line": true,
      "highlight_modified_tabs": true,
      "tab_size": 2,
      "translate_tabs_to_spaces": true


  • Git Command Line

    Your mileage may vary but by far the strongest git client out there.

    Most common git commands

    • git checkout -b $newBranchName
    • git stash
    • git pull --rebase (Warn do not do after a branch merge)

    Ensure that your version of git has completions enabled (this might require manual installation)

    Customizing your bash prompt for git status is also very helpful:

    This script whose origin has been lost will output the current branch and change status in your bash profile.

    function parse_git_branch {
      git branch --no-color 2> /dev/null | sed -e '/^[^*]/d' -e 's/* \(.*\)/(\1)/'
    function last_two_dirs {
      pwd |rev| awk -F / '{print $1,$2}' | rev | sed s_\ _/_
    c_cyan=`tput setaf 6`
    c_red=`tput setaf 1`
    c_green=`tput setaf 2`
    c_sgr0=`tput sgr0`
    function proml {
      PS1='\h:$(last_two_dirs)\[$(branch_color)\]$(parse_git_branch)\[${c_sgr0}\] \u\$ '
    function branch_color() {
      if git rev-parse --git-dir >/dev/null 2>&1
        git diff --quiet 2>/dev/null >&2
        if [[ $? -eq 0 ]]
        return 0
      echo -ne $color
  • Gitx

    GUI frontend on various commit related git operations. The staging view is very valuable for doing interactive commits and self-code review at commit time.

  • SourceTree

    General git repository viewer. Helpful for viewing stashed changes that may have accumulated on your local tree.

  • git-extras

    A collection of useful tools for doing higher level git commands such as delete-branch. When installing make sure that the command line tab completion tools to no error out as these are very helpful.

Debugging and Optimizing

  • Charles

    HTTP proxy and debugger with easy to use interface.

  • xScope

    Inspect/measure mocks and final rendered pages.

  • Gradient Scanner

    (Shameless plug) Extract CSS gradients from flatted mock images.

  • ImageAlpha/ImageOptim

    Image optimization tools. Performs both lossless and lossy compression of image assets.


  • Dropbox

    Easy way to backup remotely and share content across the team.

  • Evernote

    Free notetaking service.

  • MS Office

    Because somethings you can’t escape.

  • MS Remote Desktop Client

    Again somethings you can not escape.


  • Adium

    Chat over many protocols. Most common among the team are GTalk and AIM.

  • Propane

    Team chat. Setup growl notifications and stay connected.

  • Skype

    Sometimes you need to use your voice. Horrible at IM.

  • ScreenFlow

    Generate screen casts for sharing content with coworkers or debugging transient behaviors.


  • Alfred

    Search-based system launcher.

  • Growl

    Common notification system for Lumbar builds and Propane and others.

  • Divvy

    Window position manager

  • Stay

    Utility which will restore your windows when you connect or disconnect a monitor.

  • BetterTouchTool

    Keyboard/mouse/touchpad gesture mapper.

  • Cloud App

    Dirt simple screenshot sharing app. Useful for sharing screenshots and other local content over IM and email when attachments might not be supported or supported easily.

  • Homebrew

    OSS package manager.

  • nvm

    Node version switcher. Easily allows for switching between different versions of node.

    Current recommendations for the latest 0.8 node branch for running the development build stack as the watch issues on the 0.8 branch seem to have been resolved.

3 Comments :, , , more...

Lumbar: Modular Javascript Build

by on Jan.17, 2012, under Web Dev

Since joining @WalmartLab’s mobile web team close to a year ago we have been very busy rebuilding the mobile web platform using Backbone, Handlebars, Stylus and other awesome open source tools and frameworks.

Even though these tools allow for some pretty impressive feats of javascript, we kept hitting inefficiencies both in execution and developer time due to resource loading and management.

When dealing with handlebars for example, we consistently found that we were trying to fight against the system to manage the templates used by a view. We neither wanted to manually inline the template in the javascript as we all know that escaping a language within a language is just painful, ala Java running SQL, nor did we want to add the additional overhead of an additional request for deferred loading of templates or worse inlining all application templates within the html file.

Being both constrained by the mobile environment and needing to operate at the scale of Walmart it became apparent very quickly that we needed to have some sort of build-time utility to manage this so the developer can focus on creating the application logic, throw it into the build tool and out comes a nicely optimized module of code and styles.

Lumbar along with the associated Lumbar projects such as lumbar-loader and lumbar-long-expires are the fruits of these efforts.


The Lumbar suite focuses on the management of all resources required to generate complex javascript applications across many different platforms and environments. It’s primary goals are to easily package, optimize, link to resources such as javascript, html, templates, styles, images, and any other client-side resources that web application may require.

From it’s initial implementation, Lumbar has focused on making client performance the number one goal, to this end it allows for chunking resources into distinct code modules, easy minification, inlining, and cache management.


Lumbar is configured through a simple JSON config file, defining modules which are simple, demand loaded, segments of the application.

A base module that loads the core application:
    "base": {
      "scripts": [
        {"src": "js/lib/zepto.js", "global": true},
        {"src": "js/lib/underscore.js", "global": true},
        {"src": "js/lib/backbone.js", "global": true},
        {"src": "js/lib/handlebars.js", "global": true},
        {"src": "js/lib/thorax.js", "global": true},
        {"src": "js/lib/script.js", "global": true},
        {"src": "js/lib/lumbar-loader.js", "platform": "web"},
        {"src": "js/lib/lumbar-loader-standard.js", "platform": "web"},
        {"src": "js/lib/lumbar-loader-backbone.js", "platform": "web"},
        {"src": "js/bridge.js", "platforms": ["iphone", "ipad", "android"]},
        {"src": "js/bridge-android.js", "platform": "android"},
        {"src": "js/bridge-ios.js", "platforms": ["ipad","iphone"]},
        {"module-map": true}
      "styles": [
        {"src": "styles/iphone.styl", "platform": "iphone"},
        {"src": "styles/android.styl", "platform": "android"},
        {"src": "styles/ipad.styl", "platform": "ipad"},
        {"src": "styles/web.styl", "platform": "web"}
      "static": [
        {"src": "static/#{platform}/index.html", "dest": "index.html"}

A router-linked module. When using backbone/thorax integration, this module will automatically load when the # or #hello routes are navigated:
    "hello-world": {
      "routes": {
        "": "index",
        "hello": "index"
      "scripts": [
      "styles": [

This config file also defines the platforms that lumbar will generate, allowing for customizing the modules for different environments ("platforms": [ "android", "iphone", "ipad", "web" ]). At @WalmartLabs we utilize this to serve customized experiences for the native clients utilizing the same codebase.

Walmart Checkout Designs

Single stylus codebase styled for iPhone, Android, and mobile web platforms.

Walmart Checkout - iPad

More dramatic customizations of the same codebase utilizing platform conditional code.

The final component of the configuration is the packages component, which allows for bundling specific modules into singular responses when a particular use case only uses a subset of modules, such as the native checkout implementations utilized by @WalmartLabs.

  "packages": {
    "web": {
      "platforms": [ "web" ],
      "combine": false
    "native-hello-world": {
      "platforms": [ "android", "iphone", "ipad" ],
      "modules": [ "base", "hello-world" ],
      "combine": true
Package declarations defining normal loading for web and combined for native platforms.

On building this will generate the following structure:

    $ find . -type f

Which can be deployed as static resources to any web server, served via a CDN, or distributed by many other means.

While not a core feature, the lumbar-long-expires plugin takes this a step further by allowing resources to include expires tokens in their names automatically. When enabled the above may generate content like the following, allowing for the application resources to be served with extended Expires headers.

    $ find . -type f

The @WalmartLabs mobile team believes strongly in open source software which is why in addition to open sourcing Lumbar we are also open sourcing our Thorax framework. If you are a backbone user looking to ease common tasks such as data binding and linking data operations to a particular route I urge you to take a look. It even integrates with Lumbar!

Comments Off on Lumbar: Modular Javascript Build :, , , , more...

Quick: Firediff and Firefocus updated for 5.0 support

by on Jul.06, 2011, under Firediff, Firefocus

Both Firediff and Firefocus have been updated to increase the target application support up to Firefox 5.0.

Both of these are available from the update stream on this site. New installations are recommended to use the Firediff and Firefocus projects on AMO as these will be more responsive to the march of Firefox releases.

Comments Off on Quick: Firediff and Firefocus updated for 5.0 support :, , , , more...

Firediff 1.1.2

by on Mar.21, 2011, under Firediff, Firefox, Web Dev

Just in time for the impending Firefox 4.0 release, Firediff has been updated to version 1.1.2. This release contains compatibility changes for Firefox 4.0 and Firebug 1.7 as well as the ability to sort CSS properties alphabetically.

As always, the latest version is available here and is currently under review at AMO.

2 Comments :, , more...

Firediff 1.1.1

by on Dec.22, 2010, under Dev, Firediff, Firefox, Web Dev

Firediff has been updated to 1.1.1 on the incaseofstairs servers. This version is a minor bug release that fixes the Save Diff and Snapshot functionality.

Updated package is available here and is under review at AMO

Thanks to Borris and Joel for letting me know about this issue. Feel free to contact me with any other issues you may have found.

Comments Off on Firediff 1.1.1 more...

Firebug Extension Updates: Firebug 1.6

by on Dec.03, 2010, under Firediff, Firefocus

As many of you are already aware, the recent release of Firebug 1.6 introduced some API changes that caused breakages within Firediff. To fix these some minor code changes within Firediff were necessary, thus the 1.1 release that has just been published.

Along with the updates for the new APIs, this version also includes:

  • Copy support
  • Bug fixes for Firebug detached mode
  • Change monitor context menu fixes
  • Slight adjustment to the colors used within the text diffs

There are a few support changes in this release. Rather than trying to support multiple versions of both Firebug and Gecko, official testing is limited to a single version of Firebug, 1.6, and as a consequence for Firebug 1.6 to a single version of Firefox, 3.6. This is simply due to the increased QA time that is required to test all of the permutations of Firebug version, Gecko version, and OS type. When updating for the changed APIs in Firebug 1.6 attempts were made to maintain compatibility with Firebug 1.5, but this configuration is no longer officially tested.

Since I was going to through the release process for Firediff I decided to release the 1.2 version of Firefocus as well. This version implements the uk-UA locale but is otherwise the same as 1.1.

Firediff 1.1 is available here on incaseofstairs and is currently under review on AMO. Firefocus 1.2 is available here on incaseofstairs and is currently under review on AMO.

Thanks to everyone who notified me of the breakage when 1.6 was released. It’s great to hear feedback from users and to hear that the project is in active use! As always please do not hesitate to let me know how the project is working for you, good or bad.

6 Comments :, , , more...

Cross Platform Text-Indexer

by on Nov.25, 2010, under Web Dev, webOS

While working on a recent Facebook release we ran into a performance bottleneck within the Mojo.Format.runTextIndexer API. Performance on device was on the order of a couple of seconds to process the content for feed items 30-50. This combined with the other tasks in the formatting and rendering cycle led to poor performance in the news stream.

For those who are not familiar with the Mojo.Format.runTextIndexer API, this API scans human generated text for URLs, phone numbers and email addresses, replacing the plain text representation with HTML links to the particular object. Additionally this API will replace emoticons with image representations on supporting platforms.

With the news stream scene being the primary scene in the application it was vital that we make this as performant as possible so I spent some time profiling this and determined that the bulk of the time in this operation was spent in the generic C indexer logic. Since at it’s core this is just a text scanning heuristic that, for the most part, does not rely on any C-level constructs, I decided to investigate a Javascript implementation to see if this would be more performant.

The result was a Javascript implementation that was many magnitudes faster than the core implementation (multiple seconds vs. ~10ms for a variety of Facebook news feeds), allowing for much faster execution as well as the creation of the library being released today.

While this library is designed primarily for webOS applications, it has also been designed to work in cross-platform environments for all functionality other than the emoticon replacement which requires platform specific logic to determine the proper image to replace.


There are two key components to this implementation, the cross platform link indexer and the platform specific emoticon processor.

The link indexer is a two-stage regular expression, using the quite daunting INDEXER_REGEX regex to extract possible linker tokens with Javascript being used to determine the meaning of each token (or throwing it out just text content).

The emoticon processor is implemented by scanning for known, or possibly known, emoticons using the EMOTICON_REGEX regex and then passing these tokens to the platform’s text indexer implementation. Doing this allows for our own custom implementation while retaining the look and feel of emoticons used by the rest of the platform. For non-Mojo platforms this logic is disabled and emoticons will be left unmodified, with minimal change.


HTML Content

Like the API this aims to replace, this API does not handle HTML context when replacing content. As a consequence this algorithm can break HTML content. In order to prevent this, the input and outputs for the API should be considered text or minimal HTML that will not match any of the replacements.

It is still possible to use this with content containing HTML by processing in a manner similar to the following although the input still needs to be filtered for XSS and other security concerns.

        var srcText = $(this).val(),
            womb = $("<div>" + srcText + "</div>");

            .filter(function() {
                return this.nodeType === Node.TEXT_NODE;
            .each(function() {
                var text = $(this),
                    indexedText =,
                    womb = $("<div>" + indexedText + "</div>");
                womb.contents().each(function() {



Framework Override

By default this library overrides the Mojo.Format.runTextIndexer API (when used within the Mojo framework). Care should be taken with each OS upgrade to ensure that this override does not break any expected behavior. If uncomfortable with this override then it can be removed by removing these lines from the library and using the API directly.

    // Mojo Framework override. Unused on non-Mojo platforms and may be removed if undesired in Mojo apps
    if (window.Mojo && Mojo.Format) {
        // Override the Mojo API if it exists in this context.
        Mojo.Format.runTextIndexer =;


The code is available on Github within the text-indexer repository. A cross-platform live demo is also available here.

3 Comments :, , , more...


by on Aug.01, 2010, under Web Dev

Recently heard about the relatively new jsPerf service that Mathias Bynens has created and after spending some time playing around with this on my own machine I can honestly say that I love this service. Rather than a few gushing tweets on the subject, I felt like this deserves a blog entry covering it’s coolness.

The thing that I found the most striking about the site (and most likely the reason that I am writing this now) is that it broke many of my previous assumptions about performance of specific statements and relative performance of different platforms. Is innerHTML faster than DOM manipulation when generating a DOM tree? Not for a specific (relatively simple) construct under Chrome (OS X v5). Is array.join(”) the fastest way to concat a string. On my test platforms (OS X Firefox, Safari, Opera, Chrome release versions), nope.

Being a public playground, the community benefits from the collective knowledge. Scanning through the test list I saw many of the problems that I have run into before as well as some I had never considered such as the multiple methods of performing a Math.floor operation. While some of these honestly scare me and remind me of Kernel code, it’s good to know they exist.

jsPerf has full support for mobile browsers as well, meaning that you can test performance test the various algorithm options on device and have a realistic view of how it will behave on the device. In running some of the tests on a webOS device there were some quite distinct differences between comparable environments on a desktop class machine.

As with any performance testing I would recommend running these tests multiple times on your target device(s) before selecting a particular path to use as there are many things that could cause a single test to provide inaccurate results for a given execution, particularly on the more resource constrained environments.

Great job Mathias and can’t wait to see what features are added to this as well as the content that the community creates!

1 Comment :, more...

Implementation: Facebook for webOS Add Tag UI

by on Jun.04, 2010, under webOS

Add Tag Interface

Facebook Add Tag Interface

Yesterday we released Facebook for webOS 1.2.5 Beta which brings many improvements to our photo functionality including tagging support. Now that the release is out the door, I’d like to take some time to discuss the cooler aspects of the implementation particularly the Add Tag UI.


The core layout of the Add Tag UI is an overlay container containing a fixed position header and a scrolling list below that. The entire screen is covered by these two elements, with the header section maintain its height and the content section expanding to cover the remainder.

This fixed header layout is fairly common throughout the app, the most common example being the navbar used in the majority of the application’s scenes, and is fairly easy to solve if the header is a fixed height and the content scrolls under the header. All that needs to be done is to position the header control using position: fixed and apply a margin-top to the list such that the first element in the list appears at the bottom of the fixed element.

I’ve never really like this solution as it requires that the header height be fixed and the list section be “aware” of the header rather than being only concerned about it’s own layout. With this in mind (and also wanting to play around with some of the cool things that WebKit offers but I have not been able to use on projects due to the IE factor), I decided to try out the flexible box layout type in webOS.

Flexible Box Layout

To provide some background, one of the key goals of the flexible box layout module is the ability to specify the size and growth of an element relative to both it’s siblings and it’s parent. While this was previously possible by using percentage layouts, each of the elements had to be aware of the size that their siblings expected and all elements needed to use the same relative system.

This is not the case with this layout scheme. Rather than defining a percentage of the container size, elements are defined with an affinity for the excess space in the container. This means that the layout first attempts to fit everything as it would normally layout, then adjusts each element based on the difference in size between the children and the parent. In practice this can generate much more stable, but still fluid layouts when creating applications in HTML+CSS.

The box-flex (-moz-box-flex, -webkit-box-flex) is used to define the resize affinity.

Values here can range from zero to any positive decimal value. When the value is zero, the element will not change size based on extra or lack of space in its parent. When this value is larger than zero the element is considered flexible. This means that when the layout engine determines that the parent box is either overflowed or underflowed these elements will expand or shrink such that all of the children fill the container. The differences in magnitudes of this value determines how the flexible elements are resized.

As an example a vertically oriented flexible box with 3 children whose flex values are 0, 1, and 2 and has 60px of open space will add 20px to the second element, 40px to the third element and leave the height of the first unchanged. On the other end of the spectrum if there is an overflow of 60px, the elements will be shrunk by the same dimensions above.

The flexible box model is supported by Safari 3+, Chrome 3+, Firefox 3+, and of course webOS. As covering the entirety of the specification was out of the scope of this post I would recommend reading some of the other excellent sources on this topic as well as the specification itself.


For the Add Tag UI, we take advantage of the flexible overflow case outlined above. This allows the upper section to layout at it’s natural size using -webkit-box-flex: 0 and the user list section to expand to fill the remainder of the page using -webkit-box-flex: 1. By defining the list section to be a Scroller with an embedded List, we can maintain fixed behavior for the upper section and still allow for an arbitrary number of users.

Implemented this looks something like the following:

<div class="tag-selector">
  <div class="tag-selector-panel">
    <div x-mojo-element="TextField"></div>
    <div class="form-wrapper">
      <div x-mojo-element="Button"></div>
      <div x-mojo-element="Button"></div>
  <div class="tag-scroller" x-mojo-element="Scroller">
    <div x-mojo-element="List"></div>

With the CSS doing most of the heavy lifting:

.tag-selector {
  position: absolute;
  top: 0;
  left: 0;
  bottom: 0;
  right: 0;

  z-index: 1000;

  display: -webkit-box;
  -webkit-box-orient: vertical;

.tag-scroller {
  position: static !important;
  -webkit-box-flex: 1; 

A live demo for Firefox and Safari/Chrome available is available here. Note that the demo is running a modified version to handle desktop and cross-browser differences. These are mostly experimental prefix concerns i.e. display: -webkit-box becomes

    display: -webkit-box;
    display: -moz-box;
    display: box;

Although there are a few hacks in place to force common layout under both WebKit and Gecko (See Bug 570036). Such is life developing with CSS3 :)

Future Posts

As a final note, I’d like to start a series of these posts. Are there any sections of the Facebook app that you would like me to provide an overview of their implementation? Feel free to comment on this post or drop me a line at

2 Comments :, , , , more...

Visit our friends!

A few highly recommended friends...